This is a funny song made with stations name.
More info about Yamanote Line.
If you want other people to test your app before releasing it in the app store, you can use the Ad-Hoc distribution system. It’s not well documented but it’s very easy to setup. Your beta testers and clients will be very happy because from now on they can just download the app from a link without the pain of connecting to iTunes, neither dealing with the app store. They can download the app directly from their devices.
What you need:
The device UDID.
This is the only painful part for your beta-tester. The easiest way to get this number is asking your tester to download one of the many apps that easily email that number. For example this one.
There are many others, just pick up one you like. Personally I don’t like them, the previous one is the best I could find. I will code a free one with the options I think my testers would like to have. If you want something particular in this app tell me so I will add it.
Another way they can get that number is by connecting the device in iTunes go to Summary -> Edit -> Copy Identifier (UDID) or just Command+C and email that number to you. I found the app installation the easiest way.
Development Provisioning Profile
If you are developing apps you already know what is this. If you don’t know, please start learning how to develop for the iPhone and then come back here. I wrote an old post about good books and documentation to start.
Once you got the UDID, add a new device and either create a new provisioning profile only for testers or use your own one. It’s important that you add the device in the provisioning profile so they will be able to run the app.


Uploading the ipa to your web server.
We are almost ready. First we have to prepare our file for distribution and then create an html file with the link that the tester will use to download the provisioning profile and the app.
Instructions for XCode 4.3.2
Archive your app but DON’T forget to plug your device first so you can select it as the target for compilation:


When the archive configuration window popsup select “Distribute”

Select your code signing identity.

Here select: “Save for Enterprise or Ad-Hoc Deployment”

Don’t forget to select “Save for Enterprise Distribution”.
The Application URL has to be the same url where you plan to upload your app in the server. In this case the ipa file is located at http://zuco.org/distribution/myAdhocApp.ipa (this is an example I have nothing in that location)
For title choose the same name or whatever you want.
Other fields are not necessary.

Choose a folder to save the .ipa and .plist file. Upload those files to your web server.

Finally we have to create an HTML file with both the links for the Provision file and the .ipa file.
Remember that you have to download the provision file from the development portal. If you already ran an app in your phone, you know what I’m talking about.
The HTML file:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr"> <head> <title> Your App Name</title> </head> <body> <a href="http://zuco.org/distribution/Your_Provisioning_Profile.mobileprovision"> Install Provisioning File</a> <a href="itms-services://?action=download-manifest&url=http://zuco.org/distribution/myAdhocApp.plist">Install Application</a> </body> </html>
That’s all you have to do.
Just send an email to your tester with the URL of this HTML.
The beta-tester has to first download and install the provisioning file which will open the settings in the device and ask to accept.
Then coming back to the web site, click on the Install Application link and that’s all.
If your beta-tester has already installed one time the provisioning file, he/she doesn’t have to download it again. Next time going to the Install Application link should be enough.
Let me know your experiences about this method.
This is the distribution method I use with clients and beta-testers.
Remember to read the disclaimer of this blog, which basically states that I’m not responsible of any damage, or inconvenience you might found doing what is written here. You are at your own risk.
Sources: Jeffrey Sambells

I was always interested in photography, but it was in Tokyo where I really got myself into it. Tokyo is a special city and Japan, in general, is an amazing country. Not the amazingness that you can expect from a merely touristic point of view. Japan is special in so many ways: culture, architecture, language, food, design… The list can run endlessly.
I matured my photography mainly in Tokyo, using the environment, the streets, the night. I did this so many times per week during so many years. I trained my mind to dig into the landscape in front of me and find those particular details that inspired me to take a picture and tell a story.
After spending a couple of months in Europe I realized that I’m not trained, I’m quite lost. My brain searches using a pattern that doesn’t work in EU. Why? Well, the only conclusion I came out with is that I matured my skills and experience in photography in an environment that is unique. I didn’t start photography traveling, working on assignments or for money. I just started doing it as a hobby and it became a passion.
Why Japan is so special for photography:
These are the main reasons I think enjoying photography in Japan is so different and unique respect other countries. Security and a strong civic sense are the main ones by the way.
Beautiful time-lapse video of Tokyo. I specially like the different approach from other timelapses that I saw until now. The mirror effect, the different cameras used and the non conventional view points. It’s really amazing, ++++
Enjoy it!
Tokyo Timescape from Remo Camerota on Vimeo.
Created for the Tommy Hilfiger store gallery wall 2012. Shot on Nikon D700, Canon 5DMII, GoPro HD Hero 1 and 2, Ricoh Digital GRIII.
Created by Remo Camerota, Edited by Hisako Emura, Music By The Rapid Ear Movement (Remo Camerota)
Check more on Remo’s vimeo and whitewallstudios.net

I got the new iPad last week. I was waiting to get this device mainly to test my apps on it, due its huge resolution. I was a little afraid about the need to resize all my graphics to match the new iPad resolution, but fortunately it scales well and the loss in quality is not a big deal. I can wait to update on a future release.
I read complaining reviews saying that the only improvement is the screen. Some people expected “something else”. I wonder if they understand what’s the meaning of a tablet and mainly all mobile devices. The screen is the device!. The new iPad resolution is a beauty to read on, the quality and definition is far beyond of any monitor I’ve seen before. For photography it’s one of the best screens to appreciate colors, contrast and details. The screen is one of the most important things on a tablet. It even surpasses common desktops and HDTV. This really improves the user experience.

Why did I change my previous CC license to an even less restrictive license?
At the beginning, when I started taking pictures I used a full restricted “All Rights Reserved” license, which in fact is not a license in practical terms, it’s just *DON’T TOUCH MY F.CKING PHOTOS OR I KICK YOUR ASS!”.
Then I asked myself some questions and realized that it didn’t make any sense for me.
Did I massively sell those pictures online? NO!
Will I realize if somebody copied my pictures and used them for commercial or whatever use? Unlikely. And if I do, will I start an international trial for that? Unlikely.
Would I be happy if a magazine or a newspaper used my pictures? YES! As far as they mention the author!
Do I always receive emails from people or companies asking to use the pictures? YES
And do I love to deal with all of them saying, yes you can, bla bla bla? NO!
So the best way at that time was to use an “Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Creative Commons”
After many years using this license, I rethought about what was the meaning of sharing. What am I really doing? Why do I post pictures online? What do I expect to receive for doing that?
After going to a mountain, shaved my head, seating under a tree, and meditate for 7 weeks about my online content, I realized that…
I share because I just like to show other people a story that I think is beautiful, great, amazing, interesting. Something that I liked, that I felt inspired. I just want to show it to others, maybe some people will feel the same, or different or nothing! It’s the natural need for communicate.
If my main purpose is sharing, why do I have to put any restrictions to it by complex licensing?
What if a company decided to use my pictures for commercial use? If they are looking for free pictures, they will never pay anybody for that. So instead of using somebody else’s pictures, I would be more than happy if they use mine and spread my name and work around. If they are looking for buying photographic material, even if my pics are free, they will contact me to obtain full resolution files, ask me for a legal note giving them permission, and so forth.
So restricting commercial use doesn’t really help my bank account. It just affect my work to be spread around.
So for that reason, I’ve the Attribution only license. My name and work is preserved, the merit of taking it is mine, but everybody and every company can use my work. Eventually if a company likes what I do, they will contact me for a more “personalized” relationship.
Are you afraid of using creative commons licenses? would you sleep knowing that your pictures are Attribution only?
By the way, I also changed this blog license to the same one :)
It’s quite a long time since I started using instagram on the iPhone. I really love this app and the concept behind it, but I still don’t understand, why it lacks of some very simple improvements that would make it better. No big stuff, just small tiny changes that would change the experience of using this nice social app.
This is a useful portable instrument to have an approximate reading of radiation levels. It’s not for scientific purposes but it’s enough for safety. If the readings are too strong, just run away from that area. Basically with this instrument you can avoid radioactive hot spots.
This instrument is not meant to measure food or water, as explained in their web site: http://www.st-c.co.jp/air-counter/index.html but you can use it to have an idea of the radiation level on that area.
Personally I see this useful only in areas close to the delimitation zone, but quite pointless in Tokyo or other places with no danger. Basically because big cities are constantly monitored by many national and independent organizations with much more precise instrumentation. Anyway this is not a toy. If you are in an area with a potential radiation risk, this product could be very handy. I got it in Yodobashi camera for 6000 yen. Unfortunately the design looks like a pregnancy test machine or something related to vaginal hygiene… So you could look a little hentai using this on the street (^^)
Fortunately I got this before traveling to Europe, so I can get radiation measures in several places around the old continent. Currently Vienna seems to be close to Tokyo levels or even higher, but I need to take more measurements, let’s see :)


It was a Sunday, it was in Yokohama.
It was the first time for me to visit this show. I expected something more, anyway I had a lot of fun playing with all that gear.